Imagine you worked all summer on a fishing boat. Sixty-hour weeks. Salt in your eyes. Back that doesn’t straighten until Tuesday. And when you finally get paid, someone you’ve never met — sitting in a building you’ve never visited — quietly takes a slice of what your labor was worth by printing more of the currency you were paid in. You didn’t vote for it. You weren’t asked. It just happens, every year, like weather.
That’s not a hypothetical. That’s the dollar. That’s every fiat currency that has ever existed. And if you’ve read our earlier piece on how inflation is a tax they don’t call a tax, you already know the mechanism. What I want to talk about today is the escape hatch.
Bitcoin isn’t perfect. But it’s the first tool in history that lets an ordinary person opt out of that system — not petition it, not reform it, not vote for someone who promises to fix it. Opt out. Unilaterally. That distinction matters more than any price chart.
The Problem Bitcoin Was Built to Solve
Bitcoin was released in 2009, in the immediate wake of the global financial crisis — a crisis caused largely by institutions that were then bailed out with newly printed money while regular people lost their homes. That timing wasn’t accidental.
The core insight behind Bitcoin is simple: money controlled by a central authority will always be used to serve that authority’s interests. Not yours. Theirs.
Here’s how I see it: the Fed’s mandate hasn’t changed regardless of who’s running it — finance Washington, protect Wall Street, and let inflation grind down everyone else. New face. Same game. The institution protects itself. That’s not cynicism; that’s just how institutions work, and stable systems often look fine right up until they don’t.
Bitcoin’s design directly addresses this. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin — not because a committee decided so, but because the math says so. No central bank. No board of governors. No emergency powers. The supply schedule is written in open-source code that anyone can audit.
“The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that’s required to make it work.” — Satoshi Nakamoto, 2009
That quote is seventeen years old and it has aged like a fine whiskey. Every year that passes makes it more true, not less.
What “Freedom Tech” Actually Means
People throw the phrase “freedom tech” around until it becomes wallpaper. Let me be specific about what it means with Bitcoin, because vague enthusiasm doesn’t help anyone.
It means permissionless transactions. You don’t need a bank account to use Bitcoin. You don’t need a credit score, a government ID, or a relationship with any institution. You need a wallet and an internet connection. For the roughly 1.4 billion adults globally who remain unbanked according to World Bank Findex data, that’s not a talking point — that’s a life-changing difference.
It means censorship resistance. A government can freeze your bank account. A payment processor can deactivate your merchant account for your politics. Bitcoin doesn’t care who you are or what you believe. Transactions settle because the math works, not because someone in compliance approved it.
It means self-custody. When you hold Bitcoin in a wallet where you control the private keys, no one can take it from you without your cooperation. Not a bank run. Not a Cyprus-style bail-in. Not a government deciding your wealth needs to be “frozen pending investigation.” Your keys, your coins.
It means a fixed supply. This is the one that quietly matters most. When you save in Bitcoin, you’re saving in something that can’t be diluted. Every dollar printed makes your existing dollars worth less. Bitcoin works the opposite way — as adoption grows and supply stays fixed, each unit represents a larger share of the network. That’s not a guarantee of price appreciation. It’s a structural property that fiat currency literally cannot have.
The Objections, Honestly Addressed
Look, I’ve heard every version of the skeptic’s case. Some of them are fair. Let’s run through the real ones.
“It’s too volatile to be money.” This is true in the short term and has been getting less true over time as liquidity deepens and adoption widens. In my experience, volatility is the price you pay for an asset that’s still in price discovery. Gold was volatile in the 1970s after Nixon closed the gold window in 1971. Early markets for any new asset class are volatile. The question isn’t whether Bitcoin is volatile today — it’s whether the underlying properties are sound. I think they are.
“Governments will just ban it.” Several have tried. It keeps not dying. Bitcoin is a protocol, like email. You can make it harder to use, but you can’t un-invent it. And increasingly, the political calculus is shifting — even governments that don’t like what Bitcoin represents have found that fighting it creates more political headaches than it solves. To me, this looks less like a threat and more like saber-rattling from institutions that know their leverage is shrinking.
“It’s just speculation. It has no intrinsic value.” Here’s the thing about intrinsic value — the dollar doesn’t have any either. It’s backed by “the full faith and credit” of a government that is, at the time of this writing, many trillions of dollars in debt. Bitcoin is backed by math, energy, and a global network of participants who’ve chosen to store value in it. Reasonable people can disagree about which of those is more trustworthy.
“It’s used by criminals.” So is cash. So are banks — money laundering scandals at major financial institutions, like the HSBC case that resulted in a $1.9 billion fine, illustrate fines so large they’d bankrupt a small country. Bitcoin is actually more traceable than cash because every transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger. The “criminals use it” argument is a rhetorical fig leaf, not an analysis.
How to Actually Think About Bitcoin in Your Life
I’m not going to tell you how much of your net worth to put in Bitcoin. That’s your call, not mine. What I will say is that the framing most people use is wrong from the start.
Most people approach Bitcoin as a trade — something to buy low and sell high. That’s not wrong, exactly, but it misses the deeper use case. The more useful framing is: this is how you hold savings outside the system that is actively degrading your savings.
Think about it like this. If you’d held your savings in dollars since 2013, inflation has cut the purchasing power of each dollar substantially over that period. If you’d held it in Bitcoin — even accounting for all the volatility — the outcome looks radically different. That’s not a pitch. That’s a historical observation about what these two assets have done over the same window of time.
The practical steps, if you’re starting from zero:
- Learn the basics first. Understand what a wallet is, what a private key is, what self-custody means. Don’t buy a single satoshi until you understand why the phrase “not your keys, not your coins” exists.
- Start small. You can buy fractions. You don’t need to buy a whole coin. Bitcoin is divisible to eight decimal places. Start with an amount you’re genuinely fine losing — treat it as tuition while you learn.
- Get off exchanges. Once you understand self-custody, move your Bitcoin to a hardware wallet. The exchange is a convenience for buying, not a storage solution.
- Ignore the noise. Bitcoin has “died” hundreds of times according to the mainstream financial press. It has not, in fact, died. Price obsession will make you crazy. Focus on the properties and the long game.
- Separate Bitcoin from crypto. Most altcoins are, in my view, casinos with better marketing. Bitcoin has a fixed supply, over a decade and a half of security track record, and no CEO who can be arrested or bribed. Very few other projects share those properties. Know what you own and why.
The Bigger Picture
Here’s the thing about Bitcoin that most financial commentary misses entirely: it’s not primarily an investment thesis. It’s a statement about what money should be.
Money that can be created by fiat will always be created by fiat when powerful people want it. That’s not a conspiracy theory — it’s the entire documented history of central banking. The Federal Reserve has expanded its balance sheet dramatically in response to every major crisis since its founding. In my view, the Cantillon effect describes how each expansion transfers wealth from savers to debtors, from ordinary people to the institutions closest to the money printer. Your paycheck is already lying to you about this.
Bitcoin doesn’t solve every problem. It won’t feed your family, fix your government, or make bad actors disappear. What it does is create a credible alternative — a form of money that operates by rules rather than by discretion, that treats every participant the same regardless of their political connections or institutional relationships.
Same rules for everyone. That’s all it is, really. And apparently, that’s radical enough to threaten the entire architecture of modern finance.
The real question isn’t whether Bitcoin is a good investment. The real question is: what kind of money do you want to live under? And for the first time in history, you actually get to choose.
Scrivener.PRO 
Leave a comment